data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b93b1/b93b14fe9256ff7a6458994deecf13e73fd7b370" alt="NEET UG"
Introduction
The National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for Undergraduates (NEET UG) is a pivotal examination for medical aspirants in India, determining admissions to MBBS and BDS programs nationwide. Recently, discussions have emerged regarding the frequency of this exam, leading to legal interventions and significant decisions.
Background of NEET UG Examination
Traditionally, NEET UG is conducted once annually, typically in May, in a pen-and-paper format. This single annual opportunity has been the standard since the exam’s inception, placing considerable pressure on candidates to perform optimally on the designated day.
The Plea for Biannual NEET UG Exams
A petition was filed seeking to have NEET UG conducted twice a year, similar to the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) Mains for engineering courses. The petitioner, a teacher from a coaching institute, argued that multiple attempts would reduce psychological stress on students and provide them with additional opportunities to improve their scores. This approach, they contended, would align NEET UG with JEE Mains, which offers multiple attempts annually.
Delhi High Court’s Decision
On February 12, 2025, the Delhi High Court declined to entertain the plea for conducting NEET UG twice a year. The bench, comprising Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, emphasized that such decisions fall within the administrative domain of the government. The court declared, “It is the responsibility of the authorities to evaluate the request.” That’s a policy decision by the government.” The bench further noted that several other competitive examinations also offer only a single attempt annually, indicating that NEET UG’s current structure is not unique.
Implications of the Court’s Ruling
The court’s decision maintains the status quo, meaning NEET UG will continue to be held once a year. This ruling underscores the judiciary’s recognition of the separation between policy-making and judicial intervention, affirming that such decisions are best left to the appropriate governmental authorities.
Comparative Analysis with JEE Mains
JEE Mains, the entrance examination for engineering courses, is conducted multiple times a year, allowing students several opportunities to improve their scores. In contrast, NEET UG’s annual schedule offers only a single attempt, highlighting a disparity between the two major entrance examinations in India. This difference has been a focal point in discussions about potential reforms in medical entrance assessments.
Government’s Role in Examination Policies
Policy decisions regarding the scheduling and frequency of national examinations like NEET UG are within the government’s administrative domain. The judiciary typically refrains from intervening in such matters unless there’s a clear violation of constitutional principles or rights. This delineation ensures that educational policies are crafted by those with the requisite expertise and accountability.
Reactions from the Educational Community
The court’s decision has elicited varied responses from the educational community. Some educators and coaching centers support the ruling, arguing that a single annual examination maintains a standardized assessment framework and upholds the examination’s integrity. Others express concern about the heightened pressure on students and advocate for multiple attempts to provide a fairer assessment environment. Students and parents are similarly divided, with some appreciating the clarity and consistency of a single exam, while others desire additional opportunities to mitigate the risks associated with a one-time assessment.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court’s decision to uphold the annual frequency of NEET UG underscores the importance of policy decisions being made by the appropriate governmental authorities. While the current structure remains unchanged, the discussions surrounding this issue highlight the need for ongoing dialogue among stakeholders to ensure that the examination framework best serves the interests of medical aspirants.
FAQs
- Why did the Delhi High Court decline the plea to conduct NEET UG twice a year?
- The court stated that decisions regarding the frequency of examinations fall under the administrative domain of the government and are policy matters not suitable for judicial intervention.
- How does NEET UG’s frequency compare to JEE Mains?
- Unlike NEET UG, which is conducted once a year, JEE Mains is held multiple times annually, providing engineering aspirants with several opportunities to improve their scores.
- What were the main arguments for conducting NEET UG twice a year?
- Proponents argued that multiple attempts would reduce psychological stress on students and offer additional opportunities to achieve better scores, similar to the structure of JEE Mains.
- What are the implications of the court’s decision for medical aspirants?
- The decision maintains the current structure of a single annual NEET UG exam, requiring students to focus their preparation on a one-time assessment each year.
- Is there a possibility of NEET UG being conducted twice a year in the future?
- While the court has deferred the decision to the government, future changes would depend on policy decisions made by the relevant authorities based on various considerations.